¼±Åà - È­»ìǥŰ/¿£ÅÍŰ ´Ý±â - ESC

 
"test hypothesis"¿¡ ´ëÇÑ °Ë»ö °á°úÀÔ´Ï´Ù. °Ë»ö °á°ú º¸´Â µµÁß¿¡ Tab ۸¦ ´©¸£½Ã¸é °Ë»ö âÀÌ ¼±Åõ˴ϴÙ.
¾Ë±â½¬¿î ÀÇÇпë¾îÇ®ÀÌÁý, ¼­¿ïÀÇ´ë ±³¼ö ÁöÁ¦±Ù, °í·ÁÀÇÇÐ ÃâÆÇ À¯»ç °Ë»ö °á°ú : 5 ÆäÀÌÁö: 1
¿µ¹® test ÇÑ±Û °Ë»ç
¼³¸í   
  ¾î¶² ´Ù¸¥ ¹°ÁúÀ» °ËÃâ, ÃøÁ¤, »ý¼ºÇϱâ À§ÇѠƯÁ¤ÇÑ È­ÇйÝÀÀÀ» ÀÏÀ¸Å°´Âµ¥ »ç¿ëµÇ´Â ¹æ¹ý.
¿µ¹® scratch test ÇÑ±Û ³­Àý¹ý
¼³¸í   
  ÇǺθ¦ ³¯Ä«·Î¿î ¹Ù´Ã·Î ±Ü¾î ÇǺÎÀÇ ¹ÝÀÀÀ» º¸´Â °Ë»ç·Î ÇǺΠ°ú¹Î¹ÝÀÀÀ̳ª ¾Ë·¹¸£±â¸¦ ¾Ë¾Æº¸±â À§ÇÑ °Ë»çÀÌ´Ù. ¹Ù´Ã³¡¿¡ Ç׿øÀ» ¹¯Èù µÚ, ÇǺιØÀ» ±Ü¾î ¹ÝÀÀÀ» ¾Ë¾Æº»´Ù. À̶§ Ç׿øÀÌ ¾Æ´Ñ ´ëÁ¶¹°Áú(¿¹¸¦ µé¾î º¸ÅëÀÇ ¹°)À» ¹¯Èù ¹Ù´ÃÀ» °°ÀÌ ¹ÝÀÀÇÏ¿© ÇǺ馱âÁõ(dermographism) ´ÜÁö ¹Ù´ÃÀÇ ±ÜÈû¸¸À¸·Î ¾Ë·¹¸£±â °°Àº ¹ÝÀÀÀ» ÀÏÀ¸Å°´Â Çö»ó°ú °¨º°ÇؾߠÇÑ´Ù.
  
  ³­Ã», Ã»·Â¼Ò½Ç(hearing loss)
  
  Ã»°¢ÀÌ ÀúÇÏ ¶Ç´Â »ó½ÇµÈ »óÅÂ. ¿øÀΰú Á¤µµ´Â ¿©·¯ °¡ÁöÀε¥, ³­Ã»Àº ±× Á¤µµ°¡ °¡Àå ½ÉÇÑ »óÅÂÀÌ´Ù. Ã»°¢ÀÇ Àüµµ°æ·Î¿¡ Àå¾Ö°¡ ÀÖÀ» ¶§ ³­Ã»ÀÌ ÀϾ°í, ±× º´ÅͰ¡ ¿ÜÀ̵µ³ª ÁßÀÌ¿¡ Àִ °ÍÀ» ÀüÀ½³­Ã», ³»ÀÌ¿¡ Àִ °ÍÀ» °¨À½ ³­Ã»À̶ó ÇÏ¿© ±¸ºÐÇÑ´Ù. ¶Ç º´ÅÍÀÇ ÀÚ¸®¸¦ ¸í½ÃÇÏ¿© ÁßÀ̼º ³­Ã»À̳ª ¹Ì·Î¼º ³­Ã» µîÀ¸·Î ¼¼ºÐÇϱ⵵ ÇÑ´Ù.
¿µ¹® stool guaiac test ÇÑ±Û ´ëº¯ ±¸¾ÆÀÌ¾Ç °Ë»ç
¼³¸í   
  ´ëº¯³»¿¡ ÀÖÀ» ¼ö Àִ ÀáÇ÷(´«¿¡ º¸ÀÌÁö ¾Ê´Â ÃâÇ÷)À¯¹«¸¦ °Ë»çÇϴ ¹æ¹ýÀ¸·Î, Ç÷±¸³»ÀÇ heme peroxidase¿¡ ÀÇÇØ guaiacÀÌ »êÈ­µÇ´Â ¹ÝÀÀÀ» ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© ÃøÁ¤ÇÑ´Ù. ¹æ¹ýÀº 3Àϰ£¿¡ °ÉÃÄ ÇÑ º¯¿¡¼­ 2±ºµ¥¾¿ Ã¤ÃëÇÏ¿© °Ë»çÇÑ´Ù. À§¾ç¼º ¹ÝÀÀ(°ÅÁþÀ¸·Î Ç÷¾×ÀÌ ÀÖ´Ù°í ³ªÅ¸³ª´Â ¹ÝÀÀ)Àº ½Ä¹° °ú»êÈ­È¿¼Ò¸¦ ÇÔÀ¯Çϰí Àִ ȫ´ç¹«ÀÇ ¼·Ã볪 Ç÷±¸ ¼ººÐÀ» ÇÔÀ¯Çϰí Àִ °í±â ¼·Ã렵¼­ ³ªÅ¸³¯ ¼ö ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, À§À½¼º ¹ÝÀÀ(½ÇÁ¦·Î Ç÷¾×Àº ÀÖÁö¸¸, Ç÷¾×ÀÌ ¾ø´Ù°í ³ªÅ¸³ª´Â ¹ÝÀÀ)Àº È¯¿ø·ÂÀ» °¡Áö°í Àִ ºñŸ¹Î CÀÇ º¹¿ë½Ã ³ªÅ¸³¯ ¼ö ÀÖ´Ù. Æ¯È÷ À§¾ç¼º ¹ÝÀÀÀÌ ¸Å¿ì ÈçÇÏ´Ù.
¿µ¹® Rorschach Test ÇÑ±Û ·Î¸£»þÇÏ °Ë»ç
¼³¸í   
  »ç°íÀå¾Ö¿Í Á¤¼­Àå¾Ö¿¡ ¹Î°¨ÇÑ Åõ»ç°Ë»ç(projective test). °ËÀº»ö°ú ¸î°¡Áö »öÀ¸·Î ÀÌ·ç¾îÁø À×Å©¾ó·è°°Àº µµÇüÀÌ ±×·ÁÁø 10°³ÀÇ Ä«µå¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ´Ù. ÇǰËÀÚ¿¡°Ô Ä«µå¸¦ º¸ÀÌ°í º» °Í¿¡ ´ëÇØ ¸»Çϵµ·Ï ÇÑ´Ù. ´ÙÀ½¿¡´Â ¾ó·èÀÇ ¾î´À À§Ä¡°¡ ÇǰËÀÚ°¡ ¸»ÇÑ Áö°¢´ë»óÀ» ¾Ï½ÃÇÏ´ÂÁö Ã£µµ·Ï ÇÑ´Ù. ÇǰËÀÚÀÇ ´äº¯À» ºÐ¼®Çϸ頱×ÀÇ »ç°í¿Í Á¤¼­»óÅ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ Á¤º¸¸¦ ¾òÀ» ¼ö ÀÖ´Ù. 
¿µ¹® Mantoux test ÇÑ±Û ¸ÁÅä¿ì°Ë»ç
¼³¸í   
  ¼Ò¾Æ¿¡ ÁַΠ½Ç½ÃÇϴ °Ë»ç ¹æ¹ýÀ¸·Î, BCGÁ¢Á¾ÈÄ¿¡³ª È¤Àº °áÇÙ±Õ¿¡ ÇѹøÀ̶󵵠³ëÃâµÈ °æ¿ì¿¡ ¾ç¼º¹ÝÀÀÀ¸·Î ³ª¿Â´Ù. ¿ì¸®³ª¶ó¿¡¼­´Â »ýÈÄ 1°³¿ù¿¡ BCG¿¹¹æÁ¢Á¾À» ½ÃÇàÇϹǷΠ´ëºÎºÐ ¾ç¼ºÀ¸·Î ³ª¿À°Ô µÇ³ª, ÀÌ ¿¹¹æÁ¢Á¾À» ¹ÞÁö ¾ÊÀº »óÅ¿¡¼­ ¾ç¼ºÀ¸·Î ³ª¿À¸é, °áÇÙ±ÕÀǠħÅõ¸¦ ÀǽÉÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Ù.
´ëÇÑÀÇÇù ÀÇÇпë¾î »çÀü °Ë»ö À¯»ç °Ë»ö °á°ú : 15 ÆäÀÌÁö: 1
  • ¿µ¹®
    ÇѱÛ
  • hypothesis
    °¡¼³
  • lattice hypothesis
    °ÝÀÚ°¡¼³
  • null hypothesis
    ¿µ°¡¼³, ±Í¹«°¡¼³
  • unitarian hypothesis
    Ç×üµ¿Àϰ¡¼³
  • acceptance test
    Àμö°Ë»ç
  • antibody identification test
    Ç×üȮÀΰ˻ç
  • antibody screening test
    Ç×ü¼±º°°Ë»ç
  • anticholinesterase test
    Ç×Äݸ°¿¡½ºÅ×¶ó¾ÆÁ¦°Ë»ç
  • antiglobulin test
    Çױ۷κҸ°°Ë»ç
  • antimicrobial susceptibility test
    Ç×±ÕÁ¦°¨¼ö¼º°Ë»ç
  • antinuclear antibody test
    Ç×ÇÙÇ×ü°Ë»ç
  • aptitude test
    Àû¼º°Ë»ç
  • articulation test
    ¹ßÀ½°Ë»ç
  • association test
    ¿¬»ó°Ë»ç
  • achievement test
    ¼ºÃëµµ°Ë»ç
´ëÇÑÀÇÇù Çʼö ÀÇÇпë¾îÁý »çÀü °Ë»ö À¯»ç °Ë»ö °á°ú : 15 ÆäÀÌÁö: 1
  • ¿µ¹®
    ÇѱÛ
  • hypothesis
    °¡¼³
  • null hypothesis
    ±Í¹«°¡¼³, ¿µ°¡¼³
  • nitroblue tetrazolium test
    ´ÏÆ®·Îºí·çÅׯ®¶óÁ¹·ý°Ë»ç
  • test strip
    °Ë»ç¶ì
  • test
    °Ë»ç, ½ÃÇè
  • absorption test
    Èí¼ö½ÃÇè, Èí¼ö°Ë»ç
  • agglutination test
    ÀÀÁý°Ë»ç
  • antibody screening test
    Ç×ü¼±º°°Ë»ç
  • anticholinesterase test
    Ç×Äݸ°¿¡½ºÅ×¶óÁ¦°Ë»ç
  • antiglobulin test
    Çױ۷κҸ°°Ë»ç
  • antimicrobial susceptibility test
    Ç×±ÕÁ¦°¨¼ö¼º°Ë»ç
  • blood test
    Ç÷¾×°Ë»ç
  • blood coagulation test
    Ç÷¾×ÀÀ°í°Ë»ç
  • blood sugar test
    Ç÷´ç°Ë»ç
  • bronchial provocation test
    ±â°üÁöÀ¯¹ß°Ë»ç
¿¾ ´ëÇÑÀÇÇù ÀÇÇпë¾î »çÀü °Ë»ö ¸ÂÃã °Ë»ö °á°ú : 1 ÆäÀÌÁö: 1
  • ¿µ¹®
    ÇѱÛ
  • test hypothesis
    °¡¼³°ËÁ¤
¿¾ ´ëÇÑÀÇÇù ÀÇÇпë¾î »çÀü °Ë»ö À¯»ç °Ë»ö °á°ú : 15 ÆäÀÌÁö: 1
  • ¿µ¹®
    ÇѱÛ
  • blending hypothesis
    À¶ÇÕÀ¯Àü¼³
  • central plasticity hypothesis
    ÁßÃßÀ¯¿¬¼º°¡¼³
  • countercurrent hypothesis
    ¿ª·ù°¡¼³
  • drift hypothesis
    À̵¿°¡¼³
  • dual recognition hypothesis
    Ç׿øÀÌÁßÀÎÁö°¡¼³
  • estrogen window hypothesis
    ¿¡½ºÆ®·Î°Õâ°¡¼³
  • expectation hypothesis
    ¿¹Ãø°¡¼³
  • hypothesis
    °¡¼³
  • hypoxia-selectivity hypothesis
    Àú»ê¼ÒÁõ¼±Åõµ°¡¼³
  • lattice hypothesis
    °ÝÀÚ°¡¼³
  • lipid hypothesis
    ÁöÁú°¡¼³
  • metabolic hypothesis
    ´ë»ç°¡¼³
  • molecular hypothesis
    ºÐÀÚ°¡¼³
  • monoclonal hypothesis
    ´ÜÀÏŬ·Ð°¡¼³
  • null hypothesis
    ±Í¹«°¡¼³
¿¾ ´ëÇÑÀÇÇù 2 ÀÇÇпë¾î »çÀü °Ë»ö À¯»ç °Ë»ö °á°ú : 15 ÆäÀÌÁö: 1
  • ¿µ¹®
    ÇѱÛ
  • Glucostatic hypothesis, of appetite regulation
    Ç×´ç±â¼³(ù÷ÓØÐñæò), ½Ä¿åÁ¶Àý(ãÝé¯ðàï½)
  • Lyon s hypothesis
    ¶óÀ̿°¡¼³.
  • Starling s hypothesis
    ½ºÅ¸¾Ë¸µ°¡¼³.
  • hypothesis, lattice
    °ÝÀÚ¼³
  • receptor hypothesis
    ¼ö¿ëü°¡¼³
  • G-test=£¾gonadotropin stimulation test
    °í³ªµµÆ®·ÎÇÉ ÀÚ±ØÅ×½ºÆ®. µµÆ®·ÎÇÉÁö±Ø°Ë»ç
  • Ham test=acidified serum test
    ÇÜ °Ë»ç, »ê¼ºÈ­Ç÷û¿ëÇ÷°Ë»ç
  • RPR test => rapid plasma reagin test
    ½Å¼ÓÇ÷À帮¾ÆÁø<°¨ÀÛÇ×ü>½ÃÇè
  • VDRL test= venereal disease research laboratory test
    ¼ºº´¿¬±¸¼Ò½ÄÅ×½ºÆ®.
  • VDRL test= venereal disease research laboratory test
    ¼ºº´¿¬±¸¼Ò½ÄÅ×½ºÆ®.
  • acidified serum test=Ham test
    »ê¼ºÈ­Ç÷û°Ë»ç
  • acidified-serum lysis test=Ham test
    »ê¼ºÈ­Ç÷û¿ëÇ÷°Ë»ç
  • antiglobulin test = Coombs test
    Çױ۷κҸ°°Ë»ç
  • polyethylene glycol test =PEG test
    Æú¸®¿¡Æ¿·»±Û¸®Äݰ˻ç
  • ACTH stimulation test
    ACTH Àڱذ˻ç
¿¾ ´ëÇÑÀÇÇù 3 ÀÇÇпë¾î »çÀü °Ë»ö À¯»ç °Ë»ö °á°ú : 15 ÆäÀÌÁö: 1
  • ¿µ¹®
    ÇѱÛ
  • atherosclerosis,monoclonal hypothesis
    ´ÜÀÏŬ·Ð¼º°¡¼³(Ó¤ìé¡­Ê£àã)
  • atherosclerosis,reaction to injury hypothesis
    ¼Õ»ó¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¹ÝÀÀ±âÀü
  • atomic hypothesis
    ¿øÀÚ°¡¼³(ê«í­Ê£æò).
  • blending hypothesis
    À¶ÇÕÀ¯Àü¼³(¡­ë¶îîæò).
  • countercurrent hypothesis
    ¿ª·ù°¡¼³ (¡­Ê£æò).
  • cyclol hypothesis
    »çÀÌŬ·Ñ ´ÜÀ§°¡¼³(¡­Ó¤êÈÊ£æò).
  • dopamine hypothesis
    µµÆÄ¹Î °¡¼³
  • drift hypothesis
    À̵¿°¡¼³
  • dual recognition hypothesis
    Ç׿øÀÌÁßÀÎÁö°¡¼³
  • emphysema,protease-antiprotease hypothesis
    ´Ü¹é-Ç״ܹéºÐÇØÈ¿¼Ò °¡¼³
  • estrogen window hypothesis
    ¿¡½ºÆ®·ÎÁ¨ ±¸°£°¡¼³
  • expectation hypothesis
    ¿¹Ãø°¡¼³(çãö´Ê£àã)
  • fractional kill hypothesis
  • hypothesis, lattice
    °ÝÀÚ¼³
  • lipid hypothesis
    ÁöÁú°¡¼³
´ëÇѱâ»ýÃæÇÐȸ ÀÇÇпë¾î »çÀü °Ë»ö À¯»ç °Ë»ö °á°ú : 9 ÆäÀÌÁö: 1
  • ¿µ¹®
    ÇѱÛ
  • Bachman intradermal test
    ¼±¸ðÃæÇdz»¹ÝÀÀ°Ë»ç
  • bentonite flocculation test
    º¥Å䳪ÀÌÆ®ÀÀÁý°Ë»ç
  • Casoni test
    Æ÷ÃæÇdz»¹ÝÀÀ°Ë»ç
  • circumoval precipitin test (COPT)
    Ãæ¶õÁÖÀ§Ä§°­°Ë»ç
  • intradermal test
    Çdz»¹ÝÀÀ°Ë»ç
  • Mazzotti test
    ¸¶Á¶Æ¼°Ë»ç
  • Montenegro test
    ¸óÅ״ϱ׷ΰ˻ç
  • Sabin-Feldman dye test
    (Åå¼ÒÆ÷ÀÚÃæ) »ö¼Ò¸é¿ª°Ë»ç
  • screening test
    ¼±º°°Ë»ç
´ëÇÑ»ýÈ­ÇкÐÀÚ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ ¿ë¾î »çÀü °Ë»ö À¯»ç °Ë»ö °á°ú : 15 ÆäÀÌÁö: 1
  • ¿µ¹®
    ÇѱÛ
  • acetate hypothesis
    ¾Æ¼¼Æ®»ê(ß«) ¼³(àã)
  • adapter hypothesis
    ¾Æ´äÅͼ³(àã)
  • adenylate charge hypothesis
    ¾Æµ¥´Ò»ê(ß«)´ëÀü¼³(Óáï³àã)
  • adenylate control hypothesis
    ¾Æµ¥´Ò»ê(ß«)Á¶Àý¼³(ðàï½àã)
  • Akabori hypothesis
    ¾ÆÄ«º¸¸®¼³(àã)
  • autocrine hypothesis
    ÀÚ°¡ºÐºñ¼³ (í»Ê«ÝÂÝôàã)
  • Belling's hypothesis
    º§¸µ¼³(àã)
  • biochemical coupling hypothesis
    »ýÈ­ÇÐÀû(ßæûùùÊîÜ) ¦ÁöÀ½¼³(àã)
  • biochemical deletion hypothesis
    »ýÈ­ÇÐÀû(ßæûùùÊîÜ)°á½Ç¼³(ÌÀã÷àã)
  • biogenic amine hypothesis
    »ýü(ßæô÷)¾Æ¹Î¼³(àã)
  • bookmark hypothesis
    ¼­Ç¥¼³(ßöøöàã)
  • catabolic deletion hypothesis
    ÀÌÈ­´ë»çÀû °á¼Õ¼³(ì¶ûùÓÛÞóîÜ ÌÀáßàâ)
  • chemical coupling hypothesis
    È­ÇÐ(ûùùÊ) Ä«Çøµ¼³(àã)
  • chemiosmotic coupling hypothesis
    È­ÇлïÅõ(ûùùÊß¶÷â) ¦ÁöÀ½¼³(àã)
  • conformational coupling hypothesis
    ÀÔüÇüÅÂ(Ø¡ô÷û¡÷¾) Ä«Çøµ¼³(àã)
KI ÀÇÇпë¾î »çÀü °Ë»ö À¯»ç °Ë»ö °á°ú : 15 ÆäÀÌÁö: 1
  • ¿µ¹®
    ÇѱÛ
  • hypothesis
    °¡¼³
  • pelvis perfusion test(Whitaker test)
    ½Å¿ì°ü·ù°Ë»ç
  • arm to lung time test
    ÆÈÆó¼øÈ¯½Ã°£½ÃÇè
  • chi-square test
    Ä«ÀÌÁ¦°ö°ËÁ¤
  • complement fixation test
    º¸Ã¼°áÇÕ½ÃÇè
  • contraction test
    ¼öÃà°Ë»ç
  • double blind test
    ÀÌÁ߸Ͱ˹ý
  • dye dilution test
    »ö¼ÒÈñ¼®½ÃÇè
  • guaiac test
    °úÀ̾׽ÃÇè
  • hemagglutination inhibition test
    Ç÷±¸ÀÀÁý¾ïÁ¦½ÃÇè
  • laboratory test
    °Ë»ç
  • pivot shift test
    ÃßÃà º¯À§½ÃÇè
  • provocation test
    À¯¹ß½ÃÇè
  • provocative test
    À¯¹ß½ÃÇè
  • pulmonary function test
    Æó±â´É°Ë»ç
KMLE ÀÇÇоà¾î »çÀü À¯»ç °Ë»ö °á°ú : 5 ÆäÀÌÁö: 1
PAT Pain Apperception Test; paroxysmal atrial tachycardia; patient; phenylaminotetrazole; physical abili...
H0 null hypothesis
H1 alternative hypothesis
LNH large number hypothesis
TRH tension-reducing hypothesis; thyrotropin-releasing hormone
KMLE ÀÚµ¿ÃßÃâ ÀÇÇоà¾î »çÀü À¯»ç °Ë»ö °á°ú : 5 ÆäÀÌÁö: 1
(3)H hypothesis that
E test Epsilometer test
(13)C-UBT 13)C-urea breath test
UBT 13)C-urea breath test
ABT 13C]-aminopyrine breath test
°æºÏ´ë Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ±¸°­³»°ú ±³½Ç »çÀü À¯»ç °Ë»ö °á°ú : 15 ÆäÀÌÁö: 1
  • ¿µ¹®
    ÇѱÛ
    ¼³¸í
  • altered-self hypothesis
    º¯È­ÇÑ ÀÚ±â Ç׿ø °¡¼³
    T-B Çùµ¿ÀÛ¿ëÀ̳ª Killer T ¼¼Æ÷ÀÇ Ç¥Àû¼¼Æ÷ÀÇ ÀÎ½Ä ±â±¸¿¡ À־ ¸²ÇÁ±¸´Â ¹ÝÀÀÇÏ´Â »ó´ëÀÇ ±¸Á¶·Î¼­ ºñÀÚ±âÀÎ Ç׿ø°ú ÀÚ±âÀÎ MHCÀÇ ¾çÂÊÀ» ÀνÄÇϰí ÀÖ´Ù. ÀÌ °æ¿ì »ý°¢ÇÏ´Â ¹æ½Ä¿¡ µÎ °³ÀÇ ¹æ½ÄÀÌ ÀÖÀ¸¸ç ºñÀÚ±â¿Í ÀڱⰡ ÇϳªÀÇ °ÍÀ¸·Î¼­ ÇÑ Á¾·ùÀÇ ¼ö¿ëü¿¡ ÀÇÇÏ¿© ÀÎ½ÄµÈ´Ù°í »ý°¢ÇÏ´Â °ÍÀÌ º¯È­ÇÑ ÀÚ°¡ Ç׿ø °¡¼³ÀÇ »ý°¢ ¹æ½ÄÀÌ´Ù.
  • convergence-projection hypothesis
    ÆøÁÖ Åõ»ç °¡¼³
  • dual recognition hypothesis
    2Áß Àνļ³
    ¸é¿ª ¼¼Æ÷ »çÀÌÀÇ »óÈ£ ÀÛ¿ë¿¡ À־ÀÇ T ¼¼Æ÷ÀÇ ÀÎ½Ä ±â±¸¿¡ °üÇÑ °¡¼³ÀÇ Çϳª. T ¼¼Æ÷¿¡´Â ÀÚ±âÀÇ MHC ºÐÀÚ¸¦ ÀνÄÇϱâ À§ÇÑ ¼ö¿ëü¿Í ´Ù¸¥ °ÍÀ» ÀνÄÇϱâ À§ÇÑ ¼ö¿ëü°¡ °¢°¢ µ¶¸³ÇÏ¿© Á¸ÀçÇÑ´Ù°í ÇÏ´Â »ý°¢.
  • hypothesis
    °¡¼³
    ¸î °¡ÁöÀÇ Çö»óÀ» ¼³¸íÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖÀ¸¸ç Ãß·ÐÀ̳ª ½ÇÇèÀ» ±âÃÊ·Î ÇÏ¿© °¡Á¤µÈ ÃßÃø.
  • Starling's hypothesis
    ½ºÅ»¸µÀÇ °¡¼³
  • unitarian hypothesis
    Ç×ü µ¿Àϼ³
  • abrasion test
    ¸¶¸ê ½ÃÇè
    ¸¶¸ð¿¡ °ßµð´Â Á¤µµ¸¦ ½ÃÇèÇÏ´Â °Ë»ç.
  • acetest tablet test
    ¾Æ¼¼Å×½ºÆ® Á¤ ½ÃÇè
    ¹éÁö À§¿¡ ¿Ã·Á³õÀº ¾Æ¼¼Å×½ºÆ® Á¤¿¡ ¿ä ÇÑ ¹æ¿ïÀ» ¶³¾î¶ß¸± ¶§, ¾î´À Á¤µµÀÇ ¾Æ¼¼ÅæÀÌ Á¸ÀçÇÏ¸é ±× ¾ç¿¡ µû¶ó¼­ ¾Æ¼¼Å×½ºÆ® Á¤ÀÌ ´ãÀÚ»ö
  • acetoacetic acid test
    ¾Æ¼¼Åä ÃÊ»ê ½ÃÇè
  • achievement test
    ¼öµæ´É·Â °Ë»ç, ¼öµæ´É·Âµµ °Ë»ç
  • acid elution test
    »ê ¿ë¸® ½ÃÇè
    ÅÂ¾Æ Çì¸ð±Û·ÎºóÀÇ °ËÃâ ½ÃÇèÀ¸·Î, ½½¶óÀÌµå ±Û¶ó½º À§¿¡ °ø±â °ÇÁ¶µÈ Ç÷¾× µµÆ÷ Ç¥º»À» 80% ¸ÞŸ³î·Î °íÁ¤ÇÏ¿©,
  • acoustic reflex test
    û°¢¹Ý»ç ½ÃÇè
    û°¢¹Ý»ç ¿ªÄ¡ÀÇ ÃøÁ¤¹ýÀ¸·Î¼­ Àüµµ¼º°ú °¨°¢½Å°æ¼º ³­Ã»À» °¨º° Áø´ÜÇϰųª û½Å°æÁ¾À» Áø´ÜÇÏ´Â µ¥ ÀÌ¿ëµÈ´Ù.
  • ACTH stimulation test
    ACTH ÀÚ±Ø °Ë»ç
    Çϼöü ºÎ½ÅÇÇÁú°è ¿¹ºñ·Â°Ë»çÀÇ Çϳª. ºÎ½ÅÇÇÁúÀÚ±Ø È£¸£¸ó
  • Addis test
    ¾Æµð½º ½ÃÇè
    12½Ã°£ µ¿¾È ¿äÀÇ ÀÏÁ¤·® Áß ÀûÇ÷±¸ ¼ö, ¹éÇ÷±¸ ¼ö, »óÇǼ¼Æ÷, ¿øÁÖ, ´Ü¹é ÇÔ·®ÀÇ ÃøÁ¤. ½ÅÀå ÁúȯÀÇ Áø´Ü°ú °ü¸®¿¡ »ç¿ëµÈ´Ù.
  • additional diagnostic test
    ºÎ°¡Àû Áø´Ü¹ý
CancerWEB ¿µ¿µ ÀÇÇлçÀü À¯»ç °Ë»ö °á°ú : 15 ÆäÀÌÁö: 1
adaptor hypothesis A hypothesis, proposed by F.H.C. Crick, that an adaptor molecule must be present between the information-containing DNA and the protein being synthesised.
(05 Mar 2000)
altered self hypothesis The hypothesis that the T-cell receptor in MHC mediated phenomena recognises a syngeneic MHC Class I or Class II molecule after modification by a virus or certain chemicals.
See: MHC restriction.
(18 Nov 1997)
alternative hypothesis In Neyman-Pearson testing of a hypothesis, the hypothesis or family of hypotheses about the numerical value of a parameter if and only if the null hypothesis is rejected as untenable.
(05 Mar 2000)
autocrine hypothesis That tumour cells containing viral oncogenes may have encoded a growth factor, normally produced by other cell types, and thereby produce the factor autonomously, leading to uncontrolled proliferation.
(05 Mar 2000)
Avogadro's hypothesis <physics> The hypothesis that equal volumes of two different gases at the same temperature and pressure contain the same number of molecules.
(02 Jan 1998)
Bayesian hypothesis An array of surmised values of a parameter to be severally explored in the light of a current set of data, with logical symmetry being preserved among all. The merits of each hypothesis entertained are based on quantity, the prior probability. The probability of the data conditional on the hypothesis is computed as the conditional probability for each; the product of the two for each hypothesis is the joint probability, and the ratio of each joint probability to the sum of all the joint probabilities is the posterior probability for that hypothesis. Unlike the Neyman-Pearson test of hypotheses, the answer is a statement about the hypothesis, not about the sample conditional on the hypothesis. No hypothesis is preferred or prevails by default. The procedure may be applied recursively any number of times, as the data becomes available.
(05 Mar 2000)
Makeham's hypothesis A development of Gompertz' hypothesis as to the force of mortality following some mathematical law. Makeham assumed that death was the consequence of two generally coexisting causes: 1) chance; 2) a deterioration or increased inability to withstand destruction. The first of these is constant, the second is an increasing geometrical progression.
(05 Mar 2000)
gate-control hypothesis A theory to explain the mechanism of pain; small fibre afferent stimuli, particularly pain, entering the substantia gelatinosa can be modulated by large fibre afferent stimuli and descending spinal pathways so that their transmission to ascending spinal pathways is blocked (gated).
Synonym: gate-control hypothesis.
(05 Mar 2000)
Gompertz' hypothesis A theory that the force of mortality increases in geometrical progression, being based on the assumption that the average exhaustion of a person's power to avoid death is such that at the end of equal infinitely small intervals of time he loses equal proportions of the power to oppose destruction which he had at the commencement of each of these intervals.
(05 Mar 2000)
chemiosmotic hypothesis <biochemistry, cell biology> A theoretical mechanism (proposed by Mitchell) to explain energy transduction in the mitochondrion. As a general mechanism it is the coupling of one enzyme catalysed reaction to another using the transmembrane flow of an intermediate species. For example Cytochrome oxidase pumps protons across the mitochondrial inner membrane and ATP synthesis is driven by re entry of protons through the ATP synthesising protein complex. The alternative model is production of a chemical intermediate species, but no compound capable of coupling these reactions has ever been identified.
(18 Nov 1997)
Michaelis-Menten hypothesis <chemistry> That a complex is formed between an enzyme and its substrate (the O'Sullivan-Tompson hypothesis), which complex then decomposes to yield free enzyme and the reaction products (Brown hypothesis), the latter rate determining the overall rate of substrate-product conversion.
See: Michaelis-Menten constant, Michaelis-Menten equation.
(05 Mar 2000)
mnaemic hypothesis The theory that stimuli or irritants leave definite traces (engrams) on the protoplasm of the animal or plant, and when these stimuli are regularly repeated they induce a habit which persists after the stimuli cease; assuming that the germ cells share with the nerve cells in the possession of engrams, acquired habits may thus be transmitted to the descendants.
Synonym: mnaemic theory, mnemism, Semon-Hering theory.
(05 Mar 2000)
wobble hypothesis <molecular biology> Explains why the base Inosine is included in position 1 in the anticodons of various t RNAs, why many mRNA codon words translate to a single amino acid, why there are appreciably fewer t RNAs than mRNA codon types and why the redundant nature of the genetic code translates into a precise set of 20 amino acids.
Inosine in Position 1 in the anticodon can base pair with A, u or C in position 3 in the mRNA codon, so that for example UCU, UCC, UCA all code for Serine using an inosine anticodon.
(18 Nov 1997)
sequence hypothesis Francis Crick's seminal concept that genetic information exists as alinear DNA code, DNA and protein sequence are colinear.
(09 Oct 1997)
hypothesis <statistics> A supposition that appears to explain a group of phenomena and is advanced as a basis for further investigation, a proposition that is subject to proof or to an experimental or statistical test.
(11 Jan 1998)
ÇÑ¿µ/¿µÇÑ »çÀü À¯»ç °Ë»ö °á°ú : 15 ÆäÀÌÁö: 1
  • ¿µ¹®
    ÇѱÛ
  • hypothesis
    °¡¼³
  • efficient market hypothesis
    (Áõ±Ç)È¿À²Àû ½ÃÀå °¡¼³(»õ·Î¿î Á¤º¸ÀÇ ÁÖ°¡¿¡ÀÇ ¹ÝÀÀÀº µ¿½ÃÀûÀ̶õ °¡¼³)
  • hypothesis
    °¡¼³;°¡Á¤
  • nebular hypothesis(theory)
    (õ)(žç°èÀÇ)¼º¿î¼³
  • test
    ½ÃÇè,½ÃÇèÇÏ´Ù
  • Binet Simon test
    Áö³×½Ã¸ù½Ä Áö´É °Ë»ç¹ý
  • Dick test
    (ÀÇ)µñ Å×½ºÆ®(¼ºÈ«¿­ ÇǺΠ½ÃÇè)
  • Kline test
    Ŭ¶óÀÎ ½ÃÇè(¸Åµ¶ Ç÷ûÀÇ Ä§°­ ¹ÝÀÀ)
  • New Test.
    New Testament
  • Partial Test Ban Treaty
    ºÎºÐÀû ÇÙ½ÇÇè ±ÝÁö Á¶¾à
  • Rorschach test
    ·Î¸£»þÇÏ Å×½ºÆ®(À×Å©ÀÇ ¾ó·è°£Àº ¹«ÀǹÌÇÑ ¹«´Ì¸¦ ÇØ¼®½ÃÄÑ »ç¶÷ÀÇ ¼º°ÝµîÀ» ¾Ë¾Æ³»´Â °Ë»ç)
  • Wassermann test
    ¹Ù¼­¸¸ °Ë»ç(¹ÝÀÀ);¸Åµ¶ÀÇ Ç÷û Áø´Ü
  • achievement test
    Çз°˻ç
  • acid test
    »ê½ÃÇè;¾ö¹ÐÇѽÃÇè
  • alpha test
    Áö´ÉÅ×½ºÆ®
ÀÌ ¾Æ·¡ ºÎÅÍ´Â °á°ú°¡ ¾ø½À´Ï´Ù.
KMLE ¾àǰ/ÀǾàǰ ¸ÂÃã °Ë»ö °á°ú : 0 ÆäÀÌÁö: 1
  • Á¦Ç°¸í
    ¼ººÐ/ÇÔ·®
    ±¸ºÐ/º¸Çè±Þ¿©
KMLE ¾àǰ/ÀǾàǰ À¯»ç °Ë»ö °á°ú : 0 ÆäÀÌÁö: 1
  • Á¦Ç°¸í
    ¼ººÐ/ÇÔ·®
    ±¸ºÐ/º¸Çè±Þ¿©
¾Ë±â½¬¿î ÀÇÇпë¾îÇ®ÀÌÁý, ¼­¿ïÀÇ´ë ±³¼ö ÁöÁ¦±Ù, °í·ÁÀÇÇÐ ÃâÆÇ ¸ÂÃã °Ë»ö °á°ú : 0 ÆäÀÌÁö: 1
´ëÇÑÀÇÇù ÀÇÇпë¾î »çÀü °Ë»ö ¸ÂÃã °Ë»ö °á°ú : 0 ÆäÀÌÁö: 1
  • ¿µ¹®
    ÇѱÛ
´ëÇÑÀÇÇù Çʼö ÀÇÇпë¾îÁý »çÀü °Ë»ö ¸ÂÃã °Ë»ö °á°ú : 0 ÆäÀÌÁö: 1
  • ¿µ¹®
    ÇѱÛ
¿¾ ´ëÇÑÀÇÇù 2 ÀÇÇпë¾î »çÀü °Ë»ö ¸ÂÃã °Ë»ö °á°ú : 0 ÆäÀÌÁö: 1
  • ¿µ¹®
    ÇѱÛ
¿¾ ´ëÇÑÀÇÇù 3 ÀÇÇпë¾î »çÀü °Ë»ö ¸ÂÃã °Ë»ö °á°ú : 0 ÆäÀÌÁö: 1
  • ¿µ¹®
    ÇѱÛ
´ëÇÑÇØºÎÇÐȸ ÀÇÇпë¾î »çÀü °Ë»ö ¸ÂÃã °Ë»ö °á°ú : 0 ÆäÀÌÁö: 1
  • ¿µ¹®
    ÇѱÛ
´ëÇÑÇØºÎÇÐȸ ÀÇÇпë¾î »çÀü °Ë»ö À¯»ç °Ë»ö °á°ú : 0 ÆäÀÌÁö: 1
  • ¿µ¹®
    ÇѱÛ
´ëÇѽŰæ¿Ü°úÇÐȸ ÀÇÇпë¾î »çÀü °Ë»ö ¸ÂÃã °Ë»ö °á°ú : 0 ÆäÀÌÁö: 1
  • ¿µ¹®
    ÇѱÛ
    ÇÑÀÚ
´ëÇѽŰæ¿Ü°úÇÐȸ ÀÇÇпë¾î »çÀü °Ë»ö À¯»ç °Ë»ö °á°ú : 0 ÆäÀÌÁö: 1
  • ¿µ¹®
    ÇѱÛ
    ÇÑÀÚ
´ëÇѱâ»ýÃæÇÐȸ ÀÇÇпë¾î »çÀü °Ë»ö ¸ÂÃã °Ë»ö °á°ú : 0 ÆäÀÌÁö: 1
  • ¿µ¹®
    ÇѱÛ
´ëÇÑ»ýÈ­ÇкÐÀÚ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ ¿ë¾î »çÀü °Ë»ö ¸ÂÃã °Ë»ö °á°ú : 0 ÆäÀÌÁö: 1
  • ¿µ¹®
    ÇѱÛ
KI ÀÇÇпë¾î »çÀü °Ë»ö ¸ÂÃã °Ë»ö °á°ú : 0 ÆäÀÌÁö: 1
  • ¿µ¹®
    ÇѱÛ
KMLE ÀÇÇоà¾î »çÀü ¸ÂÃã °Ë»ö °á°ú : 0 ÆäÀÌÁö: 1
KMLE ÀÚµ¿ÃßÃâ ÀÇÇоà¾î »çÀü ¸ÂÃã °Ë»ö °á°ú : 0 ÆäÀÌÁö: 1
ÀÇÇÐ³í¹® ¾àÀÚ(Pubmed/Entrez) °Ë»ö ¸ÂÃã °Ë»ö °á°ú : 0 ÆäÀÌÁö: 1
Çѱ¹Ç¥ÁØÁúº´»çÀκзù ¾àÀÚ ¸ÂÃã °Ë»ö °á°ú : 0 ÆäÀÌÁö: 1
  • ÄÚµå
    ¿µ¹®
    ÇѱÛ
Çѱ¹Ç¥ÁØÁúº´»çÀκзù ¾àÀÚ À¯»ç °Ë»ö °á°ú : 0 ÆäÀÌÁö: 1
  • ÄÚµå
    ¿µ¹®
    ÇѱÛ
°æºÏ´ë Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ±¸°­³»°ú ±³½Ç »çÀü ¸ÂÃã °Ë»ö °á°ú : 0 ÆäÀÌÁö: 1
  • ¿µ¹®
    ÇѱÛ
    ¼³¸í
CancerWEB ¿µ¿µ ÀÇÇлçÀü ¸ÂÃã °Ë»ö °á°ú : 0 ÆäÀÌÁö: 1
MeSH(Medical Subject Headings) ¸ÂÃã °Ë»ö (http://www.nlm.nih.gov) °á°ú : 0 ÆäÀÌÁö: 1
MeSH(Medical Subject Headings) À¯»ç °Ë»ö (http://www.nlm.nih.gov) °á°ú : 0 ÆäÀÌÁö: 1
¿ÜºÎ ¸µÅ© - Merriam-Webster's ÀÇÇлçÀü ¸ÂÃã °Ë»ö (https://www.merriam-webster.com) °á°ú: 0 ÆäÀÌÁö: 1
¿ÜºÎ ¸µÅ© - Merriam-Webster's ÀÇÇлçÀü À¯»ç °Ë»ö (https://www.merriam-webster.com) °á°ú: 0 ÆäÀÌÁö: 1
¿ÜºÎ ¸µÅ© - A.D.A.M. Medical Encyclopedia ¸ÂÃã °Ë»ö (http://www.nlm.nih.gov) °á°ú: 0 ÆäÀÌÁö: 1
¿ÜºÎ ¸µÅ© - A.D.A.M. Medical Encyclopedia À¯»ç °Ë»ö (http://www.nlm.nih.gov) °á°ú: 0 ÆäÀÌÁö: 1
¿ÜºÎ ¸µÅ© - MedlinePlus Health Topics ¸ÂÃã °Ë»ö (http://www.nlm.nih.gov) °á°ú: 0 ÆäÀÌÁö: 1
¿ÜºÎ ¸µÅ© - MedlinePlus Health Topics À¯»ç °Ë»ö (http://www.nlm.nih.gov) °á°ú: 0 ÆäÀÌÁö: 1
¿ÜºÎ ¸µÅ© - µå·¯±×ÀÎÆ÷ ¾àÇÐ Á¤º¸ ¸ÂÃã °Ë»ö (http://www.druginfo.co.kr) °á°ú: 0 ÆäÀÌÁö: 1
Á¦Ç°¸í
ÆÇ¸Å»ç
º¸ÇèÄÚµå ¼ººÐ/ÇÔ·®
±¸ºÐ/º¸Çè±Þ¿©
¿ÜºÎ ¸µÅ© - µå·¯±×ÀÎÆ÷ ¾àÇÐ Á¤º¸ À¯»ç °Ë»ö (http://www.druginfo.co.kr) °á°ú: 0 ÆäÀÌÁö: 1
Á¦Ç°¸í
ÆÇ¸Å»ç
º¸ÇèÄÚµå ¼ººÐ/ÇÔ·®
±¸ºÐ/º¸Çè±Þ¿©
¿ÜºÎ ¸µÅ© - WebMD.com Drug Reference ¸ÂÃã °Ë»ö (http://www.webmd.com) °á°ú: 0 ÆäÀÌÁö: 1
¿ÜºÎ ¸µÅ© - WebMD.com Drug Reference À¯»ç °Ë»ö (http://www.webmd.com) °á°ú: 0 ÆäÀÌÁö: 1
¿ÜºÎ ¸µÅ© - Drug.com Drugs by Medical Condition ¸ÂÃã °Ë»ö (http://www.drugs.com) °á°ú: 0 ÆäÀÌÁö: 1
¿ÜºÎ ¸µÅ© - Drug.com Drugs by Medical Condition À¯»ç °Ë»ö (http://www.drugs.com) °á°ú: 0 ÆäÀÌÁö: 1
KMLE À¥ ¿ë¾î ¸ÂÃã °Ë»ö °á°ú : 0 ÆäÀÌÁö: 1
KMLE À¥ ¿ë¾î À¯»ç °Ë»ö °á°ú : 0 ÆäÀÌÁö: 1
ÇÑ¿µ/¿µÇÑ »çÀü ¸ÂÃã °Ë»ö °á°ú : 0 ÆäÀÌÁö: 1
  • ¿µ¹®
    ÇѱÛ
WordNet ÀÏ¹Ý ¿µ¿µ »çÀü °Ë»ö °á°ú : 0 ÆäÀÌÁö: 1
¿ÜºÎ ¸µÅ© - American Heritage Dictionary ¿µ¿µ»çÀü ¸ÂÃã °Ë»ö (https://www.ahdictionary.com) °á°ú: 0 ÆäÀÌÁö: 1
¿ÜºÎ ¸µÅ© - American Heritage Dictionary ¿µ¿µ»çÀü À¯»ç °Ë»ö (https://www.ahdictionary.com) °á°ú: 0 ÆäÀÌÁö: 1
ÅëÇÕ°Ë»ö ¿Ï·á