¼±Åà - È»ìǥŰ/¿£ÅÍŰ
´Ý±â - ESC
KMLE °Ë»ö
°Ë»ö ¼³Á¤
¿Â¶óÀÎ ÀÇÇмÀû
ÀÇÇпë¾î »çÀü
ÀÇÇоà¾î
ÀÇÇлçÀü
ÇÑ¿µ/¿µÇÑ»çÀü
¿µ¿µ»çÀü
»çÀÌÆ® ¼Ò°³
Àç°Ë»ö
"scanning hypothesis"¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ´ëÇÑÀÇÇù ÀÇÇпë¾î ¼¼ºÎ °Ë»ö °á°úÀÔ´Ï´Ù
¿¾ ´ëÇÑÀÇÇù ÀÇÇпë¾î »çÀü °Ë»ö À¯»ç °Ë»ö °á°ú :
15
ÆäÀÌÁö:
2
¿µ¹®
ÇѱÛ
countercurrent hypothesis
¿ª·ù°¡¼³
drift hypothesis
À̵¿°¡¼³
dual recognition hypothesis
Ç׿øÀÌÁßÀÎÁö°¡¼³
estrogen window hypothesis
¿¡½ºÆ®·Î°Õâ°¡¼³
expectation hypothesis
¿¹Ãø°¡¼³
hypothesis
°¡¼³
hypoxia-selectivity hypothesis
Àú»ê¼ÒÁõ¼±Åõµ°¡¼³
lattice hypothesis
°ÝÀÚ°¡¼³
lipid hypothesis
ÁöÁú°¡¼³
metabolic hypothesis
´ë»ç°¡¼³
molecular hypothesis
ºÐÀÚ°¡¼³
monoclonal hypothesis
´ÜÀÏŬ·Ð°¡¼³
null hypothesis
±Í¹«°¡¼³
oxygen fixation hypothesis
»ê¼Ò°íÁ¤°¡¼³
receptor hypothesis
¼ö¿ëü°¡¼³
ÀÌÀü
´ÙÀ½
¿¾ ´ëÇÑÀÇÇù 3 ÀÇÇпë¾î »çÀü °Ë»ö À¯»ç °Ë»ö °á°ú :
15
ÆäÀÌÁö:
2
¿µ¹®
ÇѱÛ
lyon hypothesis
¶óÀ̿ °¡¼³, Lyon °¡¼³(¡Ê£àã)
molecular hypothesis
ºÐÀÚ°¡¼³.
null hypothesis ˂ȍ
±Í¹«°¡¼³(~˧Ëç).
oxygen fixation hypothesis
»ê¼Ò°íÁ¤°¡¼³
receptor hypothesis
¼ö¿ëü°¡¼³
segregation hypothesis
ºÐ¸®°¡¼³
social causation hypothesis
»çȸ¿øÀΰ¡¼³
starling hypothesis
½ºÅ»¸µÀÇ °¡¼³(¡Ê£àã)
two hit hypothesis
ÀÌŸ°¡¼³
unitarian hypothesis
Ç×üµ¿Àϼ³
automated scanning
ÀÚµ¿ ½ºÄµ
automated scanning
ÀÚµ¿ (í»ÔÑ) ½ºÄµ
compound scanning
º¹ÇÕ (ÜÜùê )½ºÄµ
contact scanning
Á¢ÃË (ïÈõº) ½ºÄµ
electron microscope, scanning
ÁÖ»çÀüÀÚÇö¹Ì°æ
ÀÌÀü
´ÙÀ½
ÀÌ ¾Æ·¡ ºÎÅÍ´Â °á°ú°¡ ¾ø½À´Ï´Ù.
´ëÇÑÀÇÇù ÀÇÇпë¾î »çÀü °Ë»ö ¸ÂÃã °Ë»ö °á°ú :
0
ÆäÀÌÁö:
2
¿µ¹®
ÇѱÛ
ÀÌÀü
´ëÇÑÀÇÇù ÀÇÇпë¾î »çÀü °Ë»ö À¯»ç °Ë»ö °á°ú :
0
ÆäÀÌÁö:
2
¿µ¹®
ÇѱÛ
ÀÌÀü
´ëÇÑÀÇÇù Çʼö ÀÇÇпë¾îÁý »çÀü °Ë»ö ¸ÂÃã °Ë»ö °á°ú :
0
ÆäÀÌÁö:
2
¿µ¹®
ÇѱÛ
ÀÌÀü
´ëÇÑÀÇÇù Çʼö ÀÇÇпë¾îÁý »çÀü °Ë»ö À¯»ç °Ë»ö °á°ú :
0
ÆäÀÌÁö:
2
¿µ¹®
ÇѱÛ
ÀÌÀü
¿¾ ´ëÇÑÀÇÇù ÀÇÇпë¾î »çÀü °Ë»ö ¸ÂÃã °Ë»ö °á°ú :
0
ÆäÀÌÁö:
2
¿µ¹®
ÇѱÛ
ÀÌÀü
¿¾ ´ëÇÑÀÇÇù 2 ÀÇÇпë¾î »çÀü °Ë»ö ¸ÂÃã °Ë»ö °á°ú :
0
ÆäÀÌÁö:
2
¿µ¹®
ÇѱÛ
ÀÌÀü
¿¾ ´ëÇÑÀÇÇù 2 ÀÇÇпë¾î »çÀü °Ë»ö À¯»ç °Ë»ö °á°ú :
0
ÆäÀÌÁö:
2
¿µ¹®
ÇѱÛ
ÀÌÀü
¿¾ ´ëÇÑÀÇÇù 3 ÀÇÇпë¾î »çÀü °Ë»ö ¸ÂÃã °Ë»ö °á°ú :
0
ÆäÀÌÁö:
2
¿µ¹®
ÇѱÛ
ÀÌÀü
ÅëÇÕ°Ë»ö ¿Ï·á
ÀÌÀü
´ÙÀ½