¼±Åà - È­»ìǥŰ/¿£ÅÍŰ ´Ý±â - ESC

 
"chemiosmotic coupling hypothesis"¿¡ ´ëÇÑ °Ë»ö °á°úÀÔ´Ï´Ù. °Ë»ö °á°ú º¸´Â µµÁß¿¡ Tab ۸¦ ´©¸£½Ã¸é °Ë»ö âÀÌ ¼±Åõ˴ϴÙ.
´ëÇÑÀÇÇù ÀÇÇпë¾î »çÀü °Ë»ö À¯»ç °Ë»ö °á°ú : 7 ÆäÀÌÁö: 2
  • ¿µ¹®
    ÇѱÛ
  • heteronuclear coupling
    ´Ù¸¥ÇÙ°áÇÕ
  • intermediate coupling
    Áß°£°áÇÕ
  • spin-spin coupling
    ½ºÇɽºÇÉÄ¿Çøµ
  • spin-spin coupling constant
    ½ºÇɽºÇɰáÇÕ»ó¼ö
  • stimulus secretion coupling
    Àڱغкñ¿¬°á
  • surface coupling
    Ç¥¸é°áÇÕ
  • variable coupling
    °¡º¯½Ä¿¬°á
¿¾ ´ëÇÑÀÇÇù ÀÇÇпë¾î »çÀü °Ë»ö À¯»ç °Ë»ö °á°ú : 15 ÆäÀÌÁö: 2
  • ¿µ¹®
    ÇѱÛ
  • spin-spin coupling
    ½ºÇɽºÇÉÄ¿Çøµ
  • stimulus secretion coupling
    Àڱغкñ¿¬°á
  • surface coupling
    Ç¥¸é°áÇÕ
  • variable coupling
    °¡º¯½Ä¿¬°á
  • blending hypothesis
    À¶ÇÕÀ¯Àü¼³
  • central plasticity hypothesis
    ÁßÃßÀ¯¿¬¼º°¡¼³
  • countercurrent hypothesis
    ¿ª·ù°¡¼³
  • drift hypothesis
    À̵¿°¡¼³
  • dual recognition hypothesis
    Ç׿øÀÌÁßÀÎÁö°¡¼³
  • estrogen window hypothesis
    ¿¡½ºÆ®·Î°Õâ°¡¼³
  • expectation hypothesis
    ¿¹Ãø°¡¼³
  • hypothesis
    °¡¼³
  • hypoxia-selectivity hypothesis
    Àú»ê¼ÒÁõ¼±Åõµ°¡¼³
  • lattice hypothesis
    °ÝÀÚ°¡¼³
  • lipid hypothesis
    ÁöÁú°¡¼³
¿¾ ´ëÇÑÀÇÇù 3 ÀÇÇпë¾î »çÀü °Ë»ö À¯»ç °Ë»ö °á°ú : 15 ÆäÀÌÁö: 2
  • ¿µ¹®
    ÇѱÛ
  • coupling factor
    ¹è¿ìÀÎÀÚ.
  • coupling interval
    ¿¬°á°£°Ý.
  • coupling medium
    °áÇÕ ¸ÅÁú
  • coupling process
    Ä«Çøµ°úÁ¤(¡­Î¦ïï).
  • coupling scheme
    Ä«Çøµ¹æ½Ä(¡­Û°ãÒ).
  • cyclol hypothesis
    »çÀÌŬ·Ñ ´ÜÀ§°¡¼³(¡­Ó¤êÈÊ£æò).
  • dipole dipole coupling dynamic
    ½Ö±ØÀÚ ½Ö±ØÀÚ ¿ªµ¿Àû °áÇÕ
  • dopamine hypothesis
    µµÆÄ¹Î °¡¼³
  • drift hypothesis
    À̵¿°¡¼³
  • dual recognition hypothesis
    Ç׿øÀÌÁßÀÎÁö°¡¼³
  • emphysema,protease-antiprotease hypothesis
    ´Ü¹é-Ç״ܹéºÐÇØÈ¿¼Ò °¡¼³
  • estrogen window hypothesis
    ¿¡½ºÆ®·ÎÁ¨ ±¸°£°¡¼³
  • exchange coupling
    ±³È¯ °áÇÕ
  • excitation contraction coupling
    ÈïºÐ¼öÃ࿬°á(¡­â¥õêææÌ¿), ÈïºÐ¼öÃà°áÇÕ(¡­Ì¿ùê).
  • excitation secretion coupling
    ÈïºÐ(ýéÝÇ)-ºÐºñ(ÝÂÝô) °áÇÕ(Ì¿ùê)
´ëÇÑ»ýÈ­ÇкÐÀÚ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ ¿ë¾î »çÀü °Ë»ö À¯»ç °Ë»ö °á°ú : 15 ÆäÀÌÁö: 2
  • ¿µ¹®
    ÇѱÛ
  • adapter hypothesis
    ¾Æ´äÅͼ³(àã)
  • adenylate charge hypothesis
    ¾Æµ¥´Ò»ê(ß«)´ëÀü¼³(Óáï³àã)
  • adenylate control hypothesis
    ¾Æµ¥´Ò»ê(ß«)Á¶Àý¼³(ðàï½àã)
  • Akabori hypothesis
    ¾ÆÄ«º¸¸®¼³(àã)
  • autocrine hypothesis
    ÀÚ°¡ºÐºñ¼³ (í»Ê«ÝÂÝôàã)
  • Belling's hypothesis
    º§¸µ¼³(àã)
  • biochemical deletion hypothesis
    »ýÈ­ÇÐÀû(ßæûùùÊîÜ)°á½Ç¼³(ÌÀã÷àã)
  • biogenic amine hypothesis
    »ýü(ßæô÷)¾Æ¹Î¼³(àã)
  • bookmark hypothesis
    ¼­Ç¥¼³(ßöøöàã)
  • catabolic deletion hypothesis
    ÀÌÈ­´ë»çÀû °á¼Õ¼³(ì¶ûùÓÛÞóîÜ ÌÀáßàâ)
  • copy-choice hypothesis
    Ä«ÇǼ±Åà ¼³(àÔ÷Éàã)
  • deletion hypothesis
    °á¼Õ¼³(ÌÀáßàã)
  • dual signal hypothesis
    ÀÌÁß ½ÅÈ£¼³(ì£ñìãáûÜàã) (ÔÒ) synarchy
  • EMC hypothesis
    EMC¼³(àã)
  • emergency hypothesis
    ÀÀ±Þ¼³(ëëÐáàã)
KMLE ÀÇÇоà¾î »çÀü À¯»ç °Ë»ö °á°ú : 1 ÆäÀÌÁö: 2
TRH tension-reducing hypothesis; thyrotropin-releasing hormone
CancerWEB ¿µ¿µ ÀÇÇлçÀü À¯»ç °Ë»ö °á°ú : 15 ÆäÀÌÁö: 2
electrical coupling <physiology> General term for an intimate cytoplasmic contact, mediated by gap junctions, between touching cells, such that electrical current injected into either cell changes the membrane potential of both.
In neurons, arrays of gap junctions form electrical synapses, that allow action potentials to pass directly between cells. However, electrical coupling is not confined to excitable cells: many embryonic and adult epithelia are coupled, possibly to allow metabolic cooperation.
(18 Nov 1997)
electromagnetic coupling <physics> A means of extracting energy from a magnetically confined plasma, where the plasma expands and pushes on the confining magnetic field, causing electrical energy to be generated in the external field-generating circuits.
(09 Oct 1997)
energy coupling <chemistry> The tranfer of energy produced in one reaction to another.
(09 Oct 1997)
excitation contraction coupling <physiology> Name given to the chain of processes coupling excitation of a muscle by the arrival of a nervous impulse at the motor end plate to the contraction of the filaments of the sarcomere. The crucial link is the release of calcium from the sarcoplasmic reticulum and the analogy is often drawn between this and stimulus secretion coupling, that also involves calcium release into the cytoplasm.
(18 Nov 1997)
fixed coupling Where several premature beats are seen, the interval between each of them and the preceding normal beat is constant.
Synonym: constant coupling.
Variable coupling, where several extrasystoles are seen, the interval between each of them and the preceding sinus beat varies.
(05 Mar 2000)
adaptor hypothesis A hypothesis, proposed by F.H.C. Crick, that an adaptor molecule must be present between the information-containing DNA and the protein being synthesised.
(05 Mar 2000)
altered self hypothesis The hypothesis that the T-cell receptor in MHC mediated phenomena recognises a syngeneic MHC Class I or Class II molecule after modification by a virus or certain chemicals.
See: MHC restriction.
(18 Nov 1997)
alternative hypothesis In Neyman-Pearson testing of a hypothesis, the hypothesis or family of hypotheses about the numerical value of a parameter if and only if the null hypothesis is rejected as untenable.
(05 Mar 2000)
autocrine hypothesis That tumour cells containing viral oncogenes may have encoded a growth factor, normally produced by other cell types, and thereby produce the factor autonomously, leading to uncontrolled proliferation.
(05 Mar 2000)
Avogadro's hypothesis <physics> The hypothesis that equal volumes of two different gases at the same temperature and pressure contain the same number of molecules.
(02 Jan 1998)
Bayesian hypothesis An array of surmised values of a parameter to be severally explored in the light of a current set of data, with logical symmetry being preserved among all. The merits of each hypothesis entertained are based on quantity, the prior probability. The probability of the data conditional on the hypothesis is computed as the conditional probability for each; the product of the two for each hypothesis is the joint probability, and the ratio of each joint probability to the sum of all the joint probabilities is the posterior probability for that hypothesis. Unlike the Neyman-Pearson test of hypotheses, the answer is a statement about the hypothesis, not about the sample conditional on the hypothesis. No hypothesis is preferred or prevails by default. The procedure may be applied recursively any number of times, as the data becomes available.
(05 Mar 2000)
Makeham's hypothesis A development of Gompertz' hypothesis as to the force of mortality following some mathematical law. Makeham assumed that death was the consequence of two generally coexisting causes: 1) chance; 2) a deterioration or increased inability to withstand destruction. The first of these is constant, the second is an increasing geometrical progression.
(05 Mar 2000)
gate-control hypothesis A theory to explain the mechanism of pain; small fibre afferent stimuli, particularly pain, entering the substantia gelatinosa can be modulated by large fibre afferent stimuli and descending spinal pathways so that their transmission to ascending spinal pathways is blocked (gated).
Synonym: gate-control hypothesis.
(05 Mar 2000)
Gompertz' hypothesis A theory that the force of mortality increases in geometrical progression, being based on the assumption that the average exhaustion of a person's power to avoid death is such that at the end of equal infinitely small intervals of time he loses equal proportions of the power to oppose destruction which he had at the commencement of each of these intervals.
(05 Mar 2000)
Michaelis-Menten hypothesis <chemistry> That a complex is formed between an enzyme and its substrate (the O'Sullivan-Tompson hypothesis), which complex then decomposes to yield free enzyme and the reaction products (Brown hypothesis), the latter rate determining the overall rate of substrate-product conversion.
See: Michaelis-Menten constant, Michaelis-Menten equation.
(05 Mar 2000)
ÀÌ ¾Æ·¡ ºÎÅÍ´Â °á°ú°¡ ¾ø½À´Ï´Ù.
KMLE ¾àǰ/ÀǾàǰ ¸ÂÃã °Ë»ö °á°ú : 0 ÆäÀÌÁö: 2
  • Á¦Ç°¸í
    ¼ººÐ/ÇÔ·®
    ±¸ºÐ/º¸Çè±Þ¿©
KMLE ¾àǰ/ÀǾàǰ À¯»ç °Ë»ö °á°ú : 0 ÆäÀÌÁö: 2
  • Á¦Ç°¸í
    ¼ººÐ/ÇÔ·®
    ±¸ºÐ/º¸Çè±Þ¿©
¾Ë±â½¬¿î ÀÇÇпë¾îÇ®ÀÌÁý, ¼­¿ïÀÇ´ë ±³¼ö ÁöÁ¦±Ù, °í·ÁÀÇÇÐ ÃâÆÇ ¸ÂÃã °Ë»ö °á°ú : 0 ÆäÀÌÁö: 2
¾Ë±â½¬¿î ÀÇÇпë¾îÇ®ÀÌÁý, ¼­¿ïÀÇ´ë ±³¼ö ÁöÁ¦±Ù, °í·ÁÀÇÇÐ ÃâÆÇ À¯»ç °Ë»ö °á°ú : 0 ÆäÀÌÁö: 2
´ëÇÑÀÇÇù ÀÇÇпë¾î »çÀü °Ë»ö ¸ÂÃã °Ë»ö °á°ú : 0 ÆäÀÌÁö: 2
  • ¿µ¹®
    ÇѱÛ
´ëÇÑÀÇÇù Çʼö ÀÇÇпë¾îÁý »çÀü °Ë»ö ¸ÂÃã °Ë»ö °á°ú : 0 ÆäÀÌÁö: 2
  • ¿µ¹®
    ÇѱÛ
´ëÇÑÀÇÇù Çʼö ÀÇÇпë¾îÁý »çÀü °Ë»ö À¯»ç °Ë»ö °á°ú : 0 ÆäÀÌÁö: 2
  • ¿µ¹®
    ÇѱÛ
¿¾ ´ëÇÑÀÇÇù ÀÇÇпë¾î »çÀü °Ë»ö ¸ÂÃã °Ë»ö °á°ú : 0 ÆäÀÌÁö: 2
  • ¿µ¹®
    ÇѱÛ
¿¾ ´ëÇÑÀÇÇù 2 ÀÇÇпë¾î »çÀü °Ë»ö ¸ÂÃã °Ë»ö °á°ú : 0 ÆäÀÌÁö: 2
  • ¿µ¹®
    ÇѱÛ
¿¾ ´ëÇÑÀÇÇù 2 ÀÇÇпë¾î »çÀü °Ë»ö À¯»ç °Ë»ö °á°ú : 0 ÆäÀÌÁö: 2
  • ¿µ¹®
    ÇѱÛ
¿¾ ´ëÇÑÀÇÇù 3 ÀÇÇпë¾î »çÀü °Ë»ö ¸ÂÃã °Ë»ö °á°ú : 0 ÆäÀÌÁö: 2
  • ¿µ¹®
    ÇѱÛ
´ëÇÑÇØºÎÇÐȸ ÀÇÇпë¾î »çÀü °Ë»ö ¸ÂÃã °Ë»ö °á°ú : 0 ÆäÀÌÁö: 2
  • ¿µ¹®
    ÇѱÛ
´ëÇÑÇØºÎÇÐȸ ÀÇÇпë¾î »çÀü °Ë»ö À¯»ç °Ë»ö °á°ú : 0 ÆäÀÌÁö: 2
  • ¿µ¹®
    ÇѱÛ
´ëÇѽŰæ¿Ü°úÇÐȸ ÀÇÇпë¾î »çÀü °Ë»ö ¸ÂÃã °Ë»ö °á°ú : 0 ÆäÀÌÁö: 2
  • ¿µ¹®
    ÇѱÛ
    ÇÑÀÚ
´ëÇѽŰæ¿Ü°úÇÐȸ ÀÇÇпë¾î »çÀü °Ë»ö À¯»ç °Ë»ö °á°ú : 0 ÆäÀÌÁö: 2
  • ¿µ¹®
    ÇѱÛ
    ÇÑÀÚ
´ëÇѱâ»ýÃæÇÐȸ ÀÇÇпë¾î »çÀü °Ë»ö ¸ÂÃã °Ë»ö °á°ú : 0 ÆäÀÌÁö: 2
  • ¿µ¹®
    ÇѱÛ
´ëÇѱâ»ýÃæÇÐȸ ÀÇÇпë¾î »çÀü °Ë»ö À¯»ç °Ë»ö °á°ú : 0 ÆäÀÌÁö: 2
  • ¿µ¹®
    ÇѱÛ
´ëÇÑ»ýÈ­ÇкÐÀÚ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ ¿ë¾î »çÀü °Ë»ö ¸ÂÃã °Ë»ö °á°ú : 0 ÆäÀÌÁö: 2
  • ¿µ¹®
    ÇѱÛ
KI ÀÇÇпë¾î »çÀü °Ë»ö ¸ÂÃã °Ë»ö °á°ú : 0 ÆäÀÌÁö: 2
  • ¿µ¹®
    ÇѱÛ
KI ÀÇÇпë¾î »çÀü °Ë»ö À¯»ç °Ë»ö °á°ú : 0 ÆäÀÌÁö: 2
  • ¿µ¹®
    ÇѱÛ
KMLE ÀÇÇоà¾î »çÀü ¸ÂÃã °Ë»ö °á°ú : 0 ÆäÀÌÁö: 2
KMLE ÀÚµ¿ÃßÃâ ÀÇÇоà¾î »çÀü ¸ÂÃã °Ë»ö °á°ú : 0 ÆäÀÌÁö: 2
KMLE ÀÚµ¿ÃßÃâ ÀÇÇоà¾î »çÀü À¯»ç °Ë»ö °á°ú : 0 ÆäÀÌÁö: 2
ÀÇÇÐ³í¹® ¾àÀÚ(Pubmed/Entrez) °Ë»ö ¸ÂÃã °Ë»ö °á°ú : 0 ÆäÀÌÁö: 2
Çѱ¹Ç¥ÁØÁúº´»çÀκзù ¾àÀÚ ¸ÂÃã °Ë»ö °á°ú : 0 ÆäÀÌÁö: 2
  • ÄÚµå
    ¿µ¹®
    ÇѱÛ
Çѱ¹Ç¥ÁØÁúº´»çÀκзù ¾àÀÚ À¯»ç °Ë»ö °á°ú : 0 ÆäÀÌÁö: 2
  • ÄÚµå
    ¿µ¹®
    ÇѱÛ
°æºÏ´ë Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ±¸°­³»°ú ±³½Ç »çÀü ¸ÂÃã °Ë»ö °á°ú : 0 ÆäÀÌÁö: 2
  • ¿µ¹®
    ÇѱÛ
    ¼³¸í
°æºÏ´ë Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ±¸°­³»°ú ±³½Ç »çÀü À¯»ç °Ë»ö °á°ú : 0 ÆäÀÌÁö: 2
  • ¿µ¹®
    ÇѱÛ
    ¼³¸í
CancerWEB ¿µ¿µ ÀÇÇлçÀü ¸ÂÃã °Ë»ö °á°ú : 0 ÆäÀÌÁö: 2
MeSH(Medical Subject Headings) ¸ÂÃã °Ë»ö (http://www.nlm.nih.gov) °á°ú : 0 ÆäÀÌÁö: 2
MeSH(Medical Subject Headings) À¯»ç °Ë»ö (http://www.nlm.nih.gov) °á°ú : 0 ÆäÀÌÁö: 2
¿ÜºÎ ¸µÅ© - Merriam-Webster's ÀÇÇлçÀü ¸ÂÃã °Ë»ö (https://www.merriam-webster.com) °á°ú: 0 ÆäÀÌÁö: 2
¿ÜºÎ ¸µÅ© - Merriam-Webster's ÀÇÇлçÀü À¯»ç °Ë»ö (https://www.merriam-webster.com) °á°ú: 0 ÆäÀÌÁö: 2
¿ÜºÎ ¸µÅ© - A.D.A.M. Medical Encyclopedia ¸ÂÃã °Ë»ö (http://www.nlm.nih.gov) °á°ú: 0 ÆäÀÌÁö: 2
¿ÜºÎ ¸µÅ© - A.D.A.M. Medical Encyclopedia À¯»ç °Ë»ö (http://www.nlm.nih.gov) °á°ú: 0 ÆäÀÌÁö: 2
¿ÜºÎ ¸µÅ© - MedlinePlus Health Topics ¸ÂÃã °Ë»ö (http://www.nlm.nih.gov) °á°ú: 0 ÆäÀÌÁö: 2
¿ÜºÎ ¸µÅ© - MedlinePlus Health Topics À¯»ç °Ë»ö (http://www.nlm.nih.gov) °á°ú: 0 ÆäÀÌÁö: 2
¿ÜºÎ ¸µÅ© - µå·¯±×ÀÎÆ÷ ¾àÇÐ Á¤º¸ ¸ÂÃã °Ë»ö (http://www.druginfo.co.kr) °á°ú: 0 ÆäÀÌÁö: 2
Á¦Ç°¸í
ÆÇ¸Å»ç
º¸ÇèÄÚµå ¼ººÐ/ÇÔ·®
±¸ºÐ/º¸Çè±Þ¿©
¿ÜºÎ ¸µÅ© - µå·¯±×ÀÎÆ÷ ¾àÇÐ Á¤º¸ À¯»ç °Ë»ö (http://www.druginfo.co.kr) °á°ú: 0 ÆäÀÌÁö: 2
Á¦Ç°¸í
ÆÇ¸Å»ç
º¸ÇèÄÚµå ¼ººÐ/ÇÔ·®
±¸ºÐ/º¸Çè±Þ¿©
¿ÜºÎ ¸µÅ© - WebMD.com Drug Reference ¸ÂÃã °Ë»ö (http://www.webmd.com) °á°ú: 0 ÆäÀÌÁö: 2
¿ÜºÎ ¸µÅ© - WebMD.com Drug Reference À¯»ç °Ë»ö (http://www.webmd.com) °á°ú: 0 ÆäÀÌÁö: 2
¿ÜºÎ ¸µÅ© - Drug.com Drugs by Medical Condition ¸ÂÃã °Ë»ö (http://www.drugs.com) °á°ú: 0 ÆäÀÌÁö: 2
¿ÜºÎ ¸µÅ© - Drug.com Drugs by Medical Condition À¯»ç °Ë»ö (http://www.drugs.com) °á°ú: 0 ÆäÀÌÁö: 2
KMLE À¥ ¿ë¾î ¸ÂÃã °Ë»ö °á°ú : 0 ÆäÀÌÁö: 2
KMLE À¥ ¿ë¾î À¯»ç °Ë»ö °á°ú : 0 ÆäÀÌÁö: 2
ÇÑ¿µ/¿µÇÑ »çÀü ¸ÂÃã °Ë»ö °á°ú : 0 ÆäÀÌÁö: 2
  • ¿µ¹®
    ÇѱÛ
ÇÑ¿µ/¿µÇÑ »çÀü À¯»ç °Ë»ö °á°ú : 0 ÆäÀÌÁö: 2
  • ¿µ¹®
    ÇѱÛ
WordNet ÀÏ¹Ý ¿µ¿µ »çÀü °Ë»ö °á°ú : 0 ÆäÀÌÁö: 2
¿ÜºÎ ¸µÅ© - American Heritage Dictionary ¿µ¿µ»çÀü ¸ÂÃã °Ë»ö (https://www.ahdictionary.com) °á°ú: 0 ÆäÀÌÁö: 2
¿ÜºÎ ¸µÅ© - American Heritage Dictionary ¿µ¿µ»çÀü À¯»ç °Ë»ö (https://www.ahdictionary.com) °á°ú: 0 ÆäÀÌÁö: 2
ÅëÇÕ°Ë»ö ¿Ï·á